The Importance of Authority in the Military Essay

The Importance of Authority in the Military - Essay Example From this discussion it is clear that  before exploring how authority is used in the military, it is important to understand what the word means and the ideas that it implies. The Collins English Dictionary offers up a variety of definitions, such as "the power or right to control, judge, or prohibit the actions of others," or "such a power or right delegated, especially from one person to another," or "the ability to influence or control others".This study highlights that  authority can only be gained through power, mostly due to the position that someone holds. A high up position can give someone authority over others because of their job description, which likely allows them to offer guidance to subordinates. Another component of the word authority is that it is delegated or assigned, typically from one person to another. Authority is often found in a chain of command, with those towards to top of the tree afforded more authority than people lower down the food chain. Also, au thority usually is a two-way street between leaders and followers. There has to be a relationship between each set of individuals and both should know where they stand in the relationship; only in an equal relationship will there be no need for either party to have authority over the other.  Informal relationships are often like this, whereas in formal situations authority is necessary in order to preserve some sort of organization within large groups of people.... In less formal situations, a leader will look to influence his or her subordinates but not control them. Controlling a group of people allows little room for them to be creative and think outside the box. In formal organizations, control is the preferred action because organizational structures are rigid and require compliance rather than creativity. In taking into account all of the definitions mentioned above, authority forms a key part of the success of any military. Military organizations by nature can be heated environments with little room for failure. Because of this, it is important that everyone remains on the same page, particularly when it comes to military strategy. Whenever a new batch of recruits is hired to work for the military, one of the first things that they go through is a type of boot camp. The reason for this is to shape the mind so much that it will almost do anything asked of it and not question why an action is relevant. Boot camps often require new recruit to work themselves into the ground so much that they lose all ability to rationalize and think on their own two feet. Likewise, getting every solider to wear the same uniform and sleeping in the same quarters helps them to understand that they are part of a team, but a team that has no standout individuals and almost requires every solider to be a clone of the other ones. Forcing soldiers to wake up before dawn and go on treks into forests and jungles makes them mentally tough but it also prepares them to be able to do anything that is asked by their superiors. On the part of the leaders, they are only doing what is best for the success of the military, which is to produce a highly skilled but

My Educational Philosophy :: Philosophy of Education Teaching

My Educational Philosophy Everyone has their own reasons for choosing a career. Some people make decisions based on the family business or income statistics. In my case, none of the before mentioned explanations apply. My decision making process began after tenth grade, which happened to be the beginning of my Four-H counseling career. At this particular 4-H camp, I was honored to hold the title ‘counselor‘. It is a position that holds power, influence, and respect. Throughout the week, I fulfilled my position by helping numerous children with an array of situations. The campers were taught new camp songs while also shown how to deal with troubling circumstances. The smiling faces at the end of the week proved that the entire staff had been successful. In that one week, I realized that I can make a difference. The feeling of triumph that I felt was incredible; that is the feeling that I want to experience more often. So, why do I want to be a teacher? For one, I have the desire to help others. I want to make students feel like they are someone. I hope to make every child know they can succeed in life. After explaining the cell division process, I am excited to see the look of accomplishment on a child’s face once they finally understand -- that is the feeling of success. As a teacher, I will be given many opportunities to lend that special helping hand. The subject that I have chosen to teach is one that I did not dominate throughout my high school career. That is why I chose the General Science degree. I can relate with the student that is too shy to raise their hand and ask a question. I know what it is like to work a little harder because something does not come naturally. And, most of all, I know how it feels to succeed. That is the feeling that I want everyone to experience. Corresponding with a science degree, I am also pursuing a mathematics degree. I believe that God gives everyone a gift of a natural talent -- this gift should be implemented in life.

Can We Talk Essay

Divorce in the United States is very common and excepted. With powerful words like till â€Å"death do us part†, and â€Å"Adultery† being said. Communication is a must to make the marriage work with affective affirmation and self-disclosure making the words can we talk mean more now than ever before. I can relate to the article â€Å"Can We Talk† in my current new marriage for the first 1 year we never argued or had a fight. Most fights were petty and now found out to be lack of affective affirmation meaning behavior that makes your partner feel loved, cared for or special (Schoenberg, N., 2011). Self-Disclosure The act of verbally or nonverbally revealing information about yourself to other people(Sole K.,2011) In my personal relationship has gone both ways for the positive when making her feel she knows that she can trust you as well as getting to know you more and everything about you must want to know. Then the negative side when revealing to much information and then scaring them away like when you make her feel like she is married on the first date or smothering her. I would say Self-Disclosure should be used regularly after the first date and somewhat on the first date to get to know each other. The similarities I have found in my gender communication is that most men and woman complain about similar problems they are having with their gender like most men may say she talks to much or is too affectionate or not affectionate enough. Then most females would say us men are not affectionate, don’t talk, lack of emotions and so on. The times when gender based situations accrue when a man expects the female to make dinner, clean the house, make their lunch and for the men take out the trash, mow the lawn, rake the leaves. All gender specific related similarities that usually result into a situation but not always. I do feel my marriage fits into the gender specific similarities with my wife doing the laundry, dinner, making lunch, etc. I fix what she breaks and paint, maintenance, fix car problems, celling fans, bought and installed the T.V., Laptop all electronics etc. The generalizations regarding gender has caused conflicted but with better communication and me helping out more solved the problem for now. REFERENCES Schoenberg, N. (2011, January 17). Can we talk? Researcher talks about the role of communication in happy marriages, McClatchy-Tribune News Service, ProQuest Newsstand, Document ID: 2240370261, Retrieved from: http://search.proquest.com.proxy-library.ashford.edu/docview/840600645/fulltext/13BC619D20D31078D66/1?accountid=32521 Sole K., (2011) Making Connections, Bridgepoint Education, Inc., ch.7.7, retrieved from: https://content.ashford.edu/books/AUCOM200.11.1/sections/sec7.7

Case Of Ethical Dilemma In Healthcare - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 4 Words: 1109 Downloads: 3 Date added: 2019/05/18 Category Health Essay Level High school Tags: Ethical Dilemma Essay Did you like this example? Research about patient confidentiality Patient confidentiality means keeping information that is personal to them and their situation away from any third party member. This issue can be a very controversial issue at times. Doctors are required to do all they can to protect, but sometimes protecting people will require them to break a patients confidentiality. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Case Of Ethical Dilemma In Healthcare" essay for you Create order For example, someone who has been identified with the HIV virus may choose not to let others know about their status, putting others at risk. In this situation, the healthcare professional is placed in an ethical complication (Wong-Wylie 35). If the professional chooses to keep the patients status private, others may be in harms way. If he notifies the third party members, however, the patient may lose trust in the doctor and terminate their connection; it is really a stick issue (Wong-Wylie 37). The American Psychological Association (APA) talks about this topic in their ethical standards 5.05. It says professionals should keep the patients information private unless doing otherwise is ?mandated by law or where permitted by law for valid purpose such as . . . to protect the patient or client or others from harm (APA, 1992, p. 1606) (Wong-Wylie 37). APA rules from 1991 concerning this also state that professionals in these situations arent to be forced to warn others, but if they make the decision to do so, they will be defended from action against them (Wong-Wylie 37). The Canadian Counseling Association (CCA) has three exceptions to disclosure they use: the first is when it is needed to keep the patient and others safe, when legal regulations demand it, and when it is needed to keep minors safe (Sumarah et al 16). Breaking a patients trust can harm their sense of hope, which is crucial to personal satisfaction and recovery. It may even cause the patient to avoid getting any more help with their issue at all (Wong-Wylie 38). This is a definite negative to breaking promises of confidentiality. If the issue is one that can be avoided by sensible people, then maybe an alternative action, such as counseling them about being responsible and the risks they may carry with them (Wong-Wylie 39). When dealing with younger patients, trust may be more valuable because they tend to rely and depend on it more than adults do and tearing that trust may cause greater internal pain for the younger patients (Blunt 3). A study performed in the late twentieth century showed that patients through their information should be kept private but understood when revealing some of it in a professional way would benefit public health and safety (Blunt 6). Another situation that can be examined is if a minor has revealed to a counselor or such that they are abusing drugs. The minor will expect to have this kept secret, yet shouldnt the counselor notify the someone such as the parents? Breaking the minors trust will cause harm to the patient but possibly keep them from harming themselves or others in the future (Blunt 6). The two sides of this argument are that doctors should be able to break patient confidentiality if needed and that doctors should not be able to break their confidentiality under any set of conditions. The pro-revealing side would see keeping that keeping a patients confidentiality when it couldve been sacrificed to save others as a bad choice while the other side would see that as the necessary action. Lets present the case referenced earlier concerning a patient with HIV/AIDS. If a patient who has this disease decides not to disclose the fact that they have this disease to others and puts them in danger, should the healthcare professional interfere and let people in possible danger know (Wong-Wylie 35). Application of consequence-based ethics (act utilitarianism) to my ethical dilemma Premise 1: Doctors must do whats best for their patients. Premise 2: Doctors must do whats best for the public health. Premise 2.1: Keeping the fact that the patient has HIV confidential poses substantial risks to public health. Premise 3: Patients have a right to know that their information is private. Premise 3.1; Revealing the patients information breaks the patients trust. Premise 4: Doctors should prevent the spread of pathogens and viruses if possible. Premise 4.1: Revealing the patients status may prevent HIV/AIDS from spreading further. Conclusion: Therefore, the doctor should break the patients confidentiality because it will possibly save people from contracting HIV/AIDS. It will also prevent the further expansion of HIV. The patients trust may be broken, but more people are helped with this route and the disease is quelled. But even afterwards, the patient may realise that it was for the greater good, so it may lessen the pain. Application of duty-based ethics to my ethical dilemma Premise 1: Doctors have a duty to protect people Premise 2: Doctors have a duty to keep a patients confidentiality. Premise 3: Doctors have a duty to prevent the spread of disease. Conclusion: Therefore, the doctor should break the patients confidentiality and disclose the information because doing so will protect more people and fulfill more of the duties than the opposite option will. His duties require him to choose to disclose the information. Application of virtue ethics to my ethical dilemma Premise 1: Choosing to break the patients confidentiality will allow the doctor to be redeemed personally. Premise 2: Knowing that he is preventing the spread of HIV/AIDS by breaking the patients confidentiality is good for his moral character. Premise 3: Knowing that he lost the trust of his patient by breaking the patients confidentiality is bad for his moral character. Conclusion: Therefore, the doctor should break the patients confidentiality because he will get more out of it morally than keeping the information private. Application of rights to the ethical dilemma Premise 1: The patient has a right to privacy. Premise 2: The public has a right to be able to avoid contracting HIV/AIDS. Premise 3: The public has a right to not have to worry about an increasing yet preventable disease. Premise 4: Right to life. Conclusion: Therefore, the doctor should break the patients confidentiality because it protects the most rights. It only breaks the patients right to confidentiality. Keeping the information private may even threaten some peoples right to life by allowing them to contract this slow yet deadly disease. Application of medical principles to the ethical dilemma Premise 1: Breaking a patients confidentiality violates his autonomy. Premise 2: Breaking the patients confidentiality is a beneficent act for the public. Premise 2.1: Breaking the patients confidentiality is not a beneficent act for the patient. Premise 3: Breaking the patients confidentiality is the least harmful choice. Premise 4: Breaking the patients confidentiality is a just act because it provides the most good for the most people. Conclusion: Therefore, the doctor should break the patients confidentiality because it promotes the most medical principles positively.